U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Improving Outcomes for Disorders of Human Communication (R01)
The Improving Outcomes for Disorders of Human Communication initiative seeks to improve the health outcomes for individuals with deafness and other communication disorders through effectiveness and health services research in the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) mission areas of hearing, balance, smell, taste, voice, speech, and language. The following types of research studies are of interest:
Effectiveness research seeks to measure, evaluate, and/or improve patient-centered outcomes following intervention for communication disorders. Effectiveness research seeks to determine to what degree an intervention works in patients/populations in general, real-world settings, such as in diverse populations and diverse provider and clinical practice settings. Research outcomes are usually broader in range than typical patient-oriented research studies and include an expanded assessment of outcome compared to traditional clinical research metrics. For example, an outcomes study would measure functional status, well-being, quality of life, cost, health care resource use, etc., (as opposed to/or in conjunction with traditional clinical metrics such as measures of language, or speech discrimination in noise). Effectiveness research typically employs broader inclusion criteria and has fewer restrictions for participation than traditional clinical study/clinical trial/efficacy research performed under a tightly controlled research setting. Effectiveness research addresses patient-centered outcomes in practice relevant environments, focuses on quality of life, patient experience of and satisfaction with health care, and the social and economic consequences of care. It may include evaluation of economic impacts linked to health outcomes, and may be performed at either the patient or population level, or both.
Health services research examines the impact of the organization, financing, and management of health care services on the delivery, quality, cost, access to, and outcomes of such services, including demographic, social, economic, and health system factors as they relate to providing preventive, screening, diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitative services and patient outcomes of care. Research may focus on any/all of the different factors that impact access, utilization, and quality as related to outcomes of health care services. Variations in care (e.g., ethnic, cultural, provider, geographic based) are also considered. The structure, processes, and outcomes of health services are evaluated in order to determine the degree to which individuals receiving health care services actually experience measurable benefits. (http://www.hsrd.research.va.gov/funding/what-is-hsr.cfm)
Dissemination and implementation research seeks to understand how health information and scientifically based clinical practices are/are not adopted in a variety of settings. This includes research on health promotion and approaches to increase use of evidence-based guidelines by both individuals and health care providers. These studies focus on implementing research findings into practice. Individuals interested in applying for research support in implementation and dissemination research should apply under the NIDCD-participating competition “Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health (R01).” (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-16-238.html)
Applications must focus on NIDCD mission areas, and research topics must be justified in terms of potential clinical/public health impact. Appropriate studies include, but are not limited to:
- Identifying patient and provider variables that predict patient satisfaction and improved outcomes for adults with communication disorders, including quality of life and psychosocial adjustment
- Identifying patient or system factors that influence health care utilization, including patient motivation and perceived need
- Determining the potential costs and impact of insufficient care (untreated or under- treated) on real world function and outcomes, including quality of life, depression, and community engagement
- Investigating the value and effectiveness of current treatments for communication disorders on real world function and outcomes
- Evaluating the relation between the system of care and outcomes for individuals with communication disorders
- Determining the cost-effectiveness as it relates to health outcome of an intervention for a particular communication disorder
- Investigating the role of patient, family, and community engagement on outcomes
- Investigating the value of differing service delivery models for communication disorders (e.g., multidisciplinary management teams vs. single practitioner models) on outcomes
- Examining the impact of the delivery of services on the cost, access, and patient utilization of care
- Evaluating innovative delivery systems (e.g., telehealth, internet, and emerging technologies) and various delivery models (e.g., group or family)
- Evaluating the effectiveness of the provision of services and outcomes for patients with multiple chronic disabilities and conditions (e.g., complex needs)
- Examining adherence, compliance, decision-making, or patient education
- Investigating ways to promote equity and reduce or eliminate health disparities/inequities in treatment services for individuals with communication disorders
There is substantial overlap among the above-mentioned research areas and all require collaborative multidisciplinary investigations. Applicants are encouraged to create collaborative teams which may include clinical experts not only in the traditional NIDCD mission areas, but also in other medical specialties and health care professions as well as experts in sociology, health services, health outcomes, economics, biostatistics, public health, health care financing and organization, survey research, psychometrics, epidemiology, and evaluation.
The R01 activity code supports discrete, specified, circumscribed project to be performed by the named investigator in an area representing his/her specific interests and competencies. A similar program is available that utilizes the R21 activity code, which is designated for exploratory projects in the early stages of development.
Amount: Application budgets are not limited but need to reflect the actual needs of the proposed project. Proposals requesting more than $500,000 need to receive advance permission. The maximum project period is five years.
Eligibility: Higher education institutions; nonprofits other than institutions of higher education; for-profit organizations; governments; and other, including independent school districts, Public Housing Authorities/Indian Housing Authorities; Native American tribal organizations; faith-based or community-based organizations, and regional organizations.
Note: An additional cycle for this competition will be held with a deadline of October 5, 2017.
This post was filed under: